Is virtual browser more practical than VPS?

As a cross-border e-commerce, we should all know that when operating with multiple accounts, we should be careful to prevent the platform from tracking the association of their own accounts. Many merchants do not pay attention to this, which leads to account closure and economic loss. Now the mainstream account anti-association tools is nothing more than two kinds, VPS and virtual browser. Who is more useful?

Lalicat Virtual Browser

We look at them from their unique advantages:

VPS achieves the purpose of anti-association by dividing multiple virtual servers through a physical server. In the past, due to immature technology, using this method can effectively prevent platform detection, but now with the improvement of platform detection mechanism, the disadvantages of VPS are also exposed.


Based on VPS, Lalicat virtual browser is developed.


The difference between Lalicat virtual browser and VPS is that it divides into different virtual browsers. These virtual browsers share a computer, but each virtual browser can achieve perfect physical isolation. Through setting, each virtual browser can generate different fingerprint information to deal with the detection of the platform. In terms of anti-association and compatibility, it is better than VPS.


Compared with VPS, Lalicat virtual browser's unique performance can ensure that our account will not have association problems, which is why more and more people choose it.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post